MichaelG
SBH Insider
Vol. 1 No 14: St. Barth on the blade of a razor
Priceless. Overpriced. A Paradise Parable.
The piece says straight out that I’m trying to sell books and my positive POV about the island should be overwhelmingly obvious. But I’m a journalist not a PR person. My job is to say things straight out. Ignoring the truth may be momentarily comforting but it comes at a price.you do seem to post a lot about your book so perhaps the comments are dead on? no offense intended. why go to page six unless you are trying to sell your book or trying to hurt the island or both.
The real story is this: simply schedule an appointment and go interview management of EDF and get the facts.
My understanding as a 3rd party is that the 2-large generators are requiring maintenance and the 6-smaller generators are by themselves inadequate to stand alone if peak demand is reached.
As another “3rd party,” I also have a similar understanding of the facts. I think, however, that there is — among other things — a need for better PR related to the situation. In this regard, for example, we have been hearing for a number of years about plans to expand electric capacity on the island . . . yet it doesn’t seem to have happened. It also seems that the current breakdown of existing equipment might have been anticipated & better planned for. These & other thoughts undoubtedly are explained in part by budgetary issues beyond control of local EDF managers. Nonetheless, IMO, ignoring obvious issues — as appears to have happened — isn’t a responsible approach by people who should have done better in operating a public-serving agency of the French government, which is explicitly mandated to provide essential public service.The real story is this: simply schedule an appointment and go interview management of EDF and get the facts.
My understanding as a 3rd party is that the 2-large generators are requiring maintenance and the 6-smaller generators are by themselves inadequate to stand alone if peak demand is reached.
À refreshingly objective, non-agenda driven commentary on the subject.As another “3rd party,” I also have a similar understanding of the facts. I think, however, that there is — among other things — a need for better PR related to the situation. In this regard, for example, we have been hearing for a number of years about plans to expand electric capacity on the island . . . yet it doesn’t seem to have happened. It also seems that the current breakdown of existing equipment might have been anticipated & better planned for. These & other thoughts undoubtedly are explained in part by budgetary issues beyond control of local EDF managers. Nonetheless, IMO, ignoring obvious issues — as appears to have happened — isn’t a responsible approach by people who should have done better in operating a public-serving agency of the French government, which is explicitly mandated to provide essential public service.
Merci!À refreshingly objective, non-agenda driven commentary on the subject.
Also very well said!Well said Dennis!
We all know deep down (though perhaps only admit to varying degrees) the island is not great at showing its vulnerabilities--understandable given the economy runs on tourism. MG has been consistent over the years not only in stating his long-standing love for St Barth but also in reporting island truths, warts and all. I take the above piece as further suggestion of the downside(s) of excess as well as potential near-sightedness in infrastructure planning.
We all love St Barth and love takes many forms. Sometimes telling the hard truth is one of them.
I might add none of this deters us as we arrive in 2 weeks![]()



