Beatles Set to Rock 9/9/09

Jeanette

Senior Insider
Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/04/beatles.999/index.html


Still relevant after decades, the Beatles set to rock 9/9/09

By Doug Gross (CNN) -- "Number nine. Number nine. Number nine."

The repetitive refrain from one of The Beatles' most mind-bending journeys into psychedelia -- "Revolution 9," the audio pastiche from "The White Album" -- is now serving as the backbeat of a big day for the biggest band in rock 'n' roll history.

On Wednesday -- 9/9/09 -- remastered versions of the Beatles catalogue will be released, giving listeners what the remaining members of "The Fab Four" say is the closest reproduction ever of how their music sounded in the studio.

The same day, the video game "The Beatles: Rock Band" is set to be released by Harmonix. Modeled after the already popular "Rock Band" game, and closely supervised by The Beatles and their estates, the game lets players sing and strum along on a huge list of Beatles classics over scenes ranging from Liverpool's Cavern Club to their final performance on a London rooftop.

And on top of that, there's rampant speculation that a planned "music-themed" announcement by Apple Inc., also scheduled on 9/9/09, could involve the supergroup.

The Beatles are one of a handful of groups whose music has never been approved for sale by Apple's iTunes, and the timing of the announcement has fueled speculation that could finally change -- or even that specialized Beatles iPods, like the ones sold in 2004 loaded with U2's music, could be in the works.

It's a remarkable amount of buzz for a band whose roots stretch back nearly five decades. And it's a clear sign, observers say, that through time and a multitude of cultural shifts, the group's hold on the public's imagination has endured.

"People are still looking at Picasso. People are still looking at artists who broke through the constraints of their time period to come up with something that was unique and original," said Robert Greenfield, a former associate editor at Rolling Stone magazine who has written about the band. "In the form that they worked in, in the form of popular music, no one will ever be more revolutionary, more creative and more distinctive than The Beatles were."

Research shows that more than 40 years after their last public performance, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr's music remains as interesting to young people now as it ever was.

A Pew Research survey released last month showed that 81 percent of respondents between ages 16-29 said they liked The Beatles. Eleven percent said they dislike the band and only 4 percent said they have never heard of them.

By comparison, current rockers Coldplay received 39 percent positive responses, with 45 percent saying they'd never heard of them. Forty-two percent said they like hip-hop star Kanye West.

"To put this in perspective: Try imagining young adults back in the 1960s putting the big jazz bands of the roaring '20s at the top of their list of favorites," the survey reads. "Not very likely."

Walter Everett, professor and chairman of music theory at the University of Michigan, said his students know The Beatles catalogue as well today as they would have 30 years ago.

He said the cultural phenomenon that was The Beatles -- the frenzy-inducing early concerts, the furor when John Lennon said the group was "more popular than Jesus," the pre-Internet obsession over "Paul is dead" rumors -- made them something more than just another rock group.

"They were just idolized," said Everett, who has written several books on the band. "It was a musical revolution, but [also] the hair, the clothing, their attitude about the establishment, their support of everybody, young and old alike, to try to understand each other at a very difficult time.

"Some of that message endures."

But at the heart of the phenomenon, experts agree, is the music. From the charming, school-boy bop of "I Want To Hold Your Hand" to the blistering assault of "Helter Skelter," the songs, they say, were just that good.

"The point is how great the music is," Greenfield said. "It isn't about the fact that The Beatles were willing to practice and get better at what they did -- it was the fact that that band contained at least two-and-a-half geniuses [Lennon, McCartney and, at times, Harrison]."

Wednesday's announcements -- and, in Apple's case, possible announcement -- show that the minders of The Beatles legacy are keeping up with how today's music consumers behave, said Bruce Birch, director of the University of Georgia's music business program.

"A lot of bands and artists have been slow to embrace the fact that technology is driving the industry," Birch said. "Their music is not going away and this is a step for them for their music to come into the 21st century."

EMI, which will be releasing the remastered recordings, has been famously protective of The Beatles brand and music. Digital reproductions like MP3s have lower sound quality than albums or compact discs -- one of the reasons they've been slow to embrace iTunes.

But if an announcement on that front is coming, Birch said, it would signal an acknowledgement that such quality-control concerns may be obsolete for the majority of the music-buying public.

"It's just a different audience out there," he said. "They're used to listening on ear buds. The sound quality, in some cases, maybe isn't' as important to them."

Everett said that, even with all of the news expected Wednesday, the Beatles music will no doubt remain popular for decades to come -- meaning more new wrinkles are almost certain.

"There's still more that can be done," he said. "Who knows where technology may be in another 10 years? We may have holographic images."

And regardless of how it's delivered, no one's expecting another band to ever eclipse the four lads from Liverpool who would go on to shape popular culture the world over.

"There will probably be another artist that comes along and captures the imagination," Birch said. "But it will never be like The Beatles."
 
Of course this is irrelevant if one doesn't like the Beatles- :thumbdown: I missed all that drug stuff I guess.
 
Andynap said:
Of course this is irrelevant if one doesn't like the Beatles- :thumbdown: I missed all that drug stuff I guess.

Hey, I missed "all that drug stuff," too. What do drugs have to do with enjoying The Beatles? I think they were one of the most (if not THE most) talented and influential bands in the history of rock and roll.

:up: :up: :up:
 
Alright while your musical taste is questionable, at least your response was humorous...

I hope Sir Paul is not reading this forum!
 
I was too young to think about drugs, etc. when they came on the scene. I was stumbling through guitar when they arrived. A true paradigm shift. (Yes, I count many pre-Beatles players (Hey! Carol Kaye and Motown friends) as inspirations and friends.) But, those shaggy haired guys from Liverpool did usher in a new era. :up: :up: :up:
 
Jeanette said:
Alright while your musical taste is questionable, at least your response was humorous...

I hope Sir Paul is not reading this forum!

I doubt that Andy would have enjoyed the Sir Paul concert as much as we did this summer. Is it possible he was a parent during the 60s? That might explain it :)
 
I really, really like the Beatles. My favs are from the first few albums. Mid-time stuff was a kicker. Watching The Blues Magoos doing "Got To Get You Into My Life" at a "coffee house" when I was supposed to be doing homework to keep the Jesuits happy next day - Priceless.

I think George Martin deserves a lot more recognition for producing all that.

[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Martin ]
 
Love the Beatles. I have every album on CD and my iPod and have most in vinyl. None with DRM, thankfully.

Does this mean I have to rebuy the entire collection again? Clever marketing!
 
Hey Voosh,

Was that Detroit Jesuit? I have a great friend and partner from there but he's older, class of '66.

Also, was that Ted Nugent's school? Whether or not, and pardon the name dropping, but I served on a nonprofit board with his brother Jeff, who tells a funny story about high school. Apparently Ted was having great success with his music and told his parents in his senior year that he wanted to skip college and play music full time. Their father, then a senior partner in a big law firm and not exactly a rock 'n roll type, first said he would kill him. Then he said that he would let him go if he managed to graduate in the top quarter of his class. Ted not only made the top quarter, but (with the Amboy Dukes) had the No. 2 single in the nation when he graduated.
 
Ted, who I met back then, was a cup of tea. He's done well. Cool. I dropped out of U of D high in my senior year to pursue music. Boink. Went back and worked my way into grad school (WSU & UM.) No complaints. Played on and off with some of the greatest studio folks in the meantime. Finding balance is a tricky, yet valuable, skill. I still work on it today.
 
JEK said:
Jeanette said:
Alright while your musical taste is questionable, at least your response was humorous...

I hope Sir Paul is not reading this forum!

I doubt that Andy would have enjoyed the Sir Paul concert as much as we did this summer. Is it possible he was a parent during the 60s? That might explain it :)


I was far too old for the teeny bopper set when they came here and I was long a jazz admirer- their music did nothing for me altho Eleanor Rigby has some nice chord changes.
 
How about the sheer, raw, simplicity and punch of "Hard Day's Night" and "Dance With You?"
 
Lot's of memories for me in this year and list.


These are the Billboard magazine Hot 100 number one hits of 1964.
Issue Date Song Artist
January 4 "There! I've Said It Again" Bobby Vinton
January 11 "There! I've Said It Again" Bobby Vinton
January 18 "There! I've Said It Again" Bobby Vinton
January 25 "There! I've Said It Again" Bobby Vinton
February 1 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
February 8 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
February 15 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
February 22 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
February 29 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
March 7 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
March 14 "I Want to Hold Your Hand" The Beatles
March 21 "She Loves You" The Beatles
March 28 "She Loves You" The Beatles
April 4 "Can't Buy Me Love" The Beatles
April 11 "Can't Buy Me Love" The Beatles
April 18 "Can't Buy Me Love" The Beatles
April 25 "Can't Buy Me Love" The Beatles
May 2 "Can't Buy Me Love" The Beatles
May 9 "Hello, Dolly!" Louis Armstrong
May 16 "My Guy" Mary Wells
May 23 "My Guy" Mary Wells
May 30 "Love Me Do" The Beatles
June 6 "Chapel of Love" The Dixie Cups
June 13 "Chapel of Love" The Dixie Cups
June 20 "Chapel of Love" The Dixie Cups
June 27 "A World Without Love" Peter and Gordon
July 4 "I Get Around" The Beach Boys
July 11 "I Get Around" The Beach Boys
July 18 "Rag Doll" The Four Seasons
July 25 "Rag Doll" The Four Seasons
August 1 "A Hard Day's Night" The Beatles
August 8 "A Hard Day's Night" The Beatles
August 15 "Everybody Loves Somebody" Dean Martin
August 22 "Where Did Our Love Go" The Supremes
August 29 "Where Did Our Love Go" The Supremes
September 5 "The House of the Rising Sun" The Animals
September 12 "The House of the Rising Sun" The Animals
September 19 "The House of the Rising Sun" The Animals
September 26 "Oh, Pretty Woman" Roy Orbison
October 3 "Oh, Pretty Woman" Roy Orbison
October 10 "Oh, Pretty Woman" Roy Orbison
October 17 "Do Wah Diddy Diddy" Manfred Mann
October 24 "Do Wah Diddy Diddy" Manfred Mann
October 31 "Baby Love" The Supremes
November 7 "Baby Love" The Supremes
November 14 "Baby Love" The Supremes
November 21 "Baby Love" The Supremes
November 28 "Leader of the Pack" The Shangri-Las
December 5 "Ringo" Lorne Greene
December 12 "Mr. Lonely" Bobby Vinton
December 19 "Come See About Me" The Supremes
December 26 "I Feel Fine" The Beatles
 
Top