Ok, I'll play... aside from spelling, how did I do?
I am no Jungian scholar, never won a spelling bee, and to grade would be to judge... one consideration that I would raise, however, is what personal meaning might each statement carry for a user if they agree with the sentiment being expressed?
In any event, because context of the origin is important to consider in determining intended meaning, here is a little.
Jung wrote “Flying Saucers” in 1957. His interests included history and astrology. He was addressing the question of why it is more desirable for saucers to exist than not at a time that he considered the end of one “Platonic month (a term that I believe he coined) and the beginning of another”, a change from one age to another. He may have been on to something there... and for some reason, I found myself recently revisiting this work that I had approached a few lifetimes back...
Jung was examining the UFO siting spike of the '50s in the context of changes that he believed occur in “the constellation of psychic dominants, of the archetypes, or 'gods' as they used to be called, which bring about, or accompany, long-lasting transformations of the collective psyche” at times of change. "Flying Saucers" looks at what can be learned from the perspective of psychology about cultural conflicts, anxieties, etc. from examining UFO sittings as a modern myth.
The short preface that Jung wrote for the first English edition (both provided in prior link) may be of interest to those who don't choose to read the entire work so here it is:
"The worldwide rumour about Flying Saucers presents a problem that challenges the psychologist for a number of reasons. The primary question—and apparently this is the most important point—is this: are they real or are they mere fantasy products? This question is by no means settled yet. If they are real, exactly what are they? If they are fantasy, why should such a rumour exist?
In this latter respect I have made an interesting and quite unexpected discovery. In 1954 I wrote an article in the Swiss weekly, Die Weltwoche, in which I expressed myself in a sceptical way, though I spoke with due respect of the serious opinion of a relatively large number of air specialists who believe in the reality of Ufos (unidentified flying objects). In 1958 this interview was suddenly discovered by the world press and the "news" spread like wildfire from the far West round the earth to the far East, but—alas—in distorted form. I was quoted as a saucer-believer. I issued a statement to the United Press and gave a true version of my opinion, but this time the wire went dead: nobody, so far as I know, took any notice of it, except one German newspaper.
The moral of this story is rather interesting. As the behavior of the press is a sort of Gallup test with reference to world opinion, one must draw the conclusion that news affirming the existence of Ufos is welcome, but that scepticism seems to be undesirable. To believe that Ufos are real suits the general opinion, whereas disbelief is to be discouraged. This creates the impression that there is a tendency all over the world to believe in saucers and to want them to be real, unconsciously helped along by a press that otherwise has no sympathy with the phenomenon.
This remarkable fact in itself surely merits the psychologist's interest. Why should it be more desirable for saucers to exist than not? The following pages are an attempt to answer this question.
C.G.Jung
September, 1958"
Even if one Platonic month turns to another, perhaps plus ça change...